Summary of Study ST003859

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR002416. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8BN76 This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886. See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Show named metabolites  |  Download named metabolite data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST003859
Study TitleEvaluation of FASP protocol for a mass spectrometry based multiomics analysis of urine sample
Study SummaryIntegrative multi-omics analysis of biological specimens such as tissues and biofluids (e.g., plasma and urine) is a powerful approach for gaining comprehensive understanding of the complex biological systems as well as in the identification of disease biomarkers. The great majority of omics datasets collected thus far resulted from a single omic (e.g. proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics and others) study, which represents a challenge for any subsequent multiomics integration analysis. Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) is a rapid and well-established technique for facilitating bottom-up proteomics preparation. However, FASP has only been employed in proteomics analysis and its utility for simultaneously isolating other biomolecules remains largely unexplored. This study assesses the performance of FASP as a convenient protocol to isolate protein and metabolite fraction from the same urine sample. Here FASP based LC-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 3163 non-redundant peptides, 957 of which were unique protein groups. In parallel, LC-Qtof-MS and GC-MS/MS analysis of metabolites fraction obtained from urine solvent based extraction, FASP filtrate, FASP residue (concentrated protein) detected 145 metabolites by LC-MS and 139 metabolites by GC-MS. Our study demonstrates that the outcomes from FASP filtrate are comparable to those from solid phase extraction or FASP residue, in terms of both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Arguing that the proposed multiomics- FASP protocol should be considered for a multiomics single-step sample preparation analysis.
Institute
Nova University of Lisbon
DepartmentDepartment of Chemistry
LaboratoryLAQV-REQUIMTE
Last NameMousa
First NameMuath
AddressLargo da Torre, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Emailm.mousa@campus.fct.unl.pt
Phone+351968720613
Submit Date2024-08-05
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)mzML, d
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2025-04-24
Release Version1
Muath Mousa Muath Mousa
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8BN76
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Project:

Project ID:PR002416
Project DOI:doi: 10.21228/M8BN76
Project Title:Evaluation of FASP protocol for a mass spectrometry based multiomics analysis of urine sample
Project Summary:Integrative multi-omics analysis of biological specimens such as tissues and biofluids (e.g., plasma and urine) is a powerful approach for gaining comprehensive understanding of the complex biological systems as well as in the identification of disease biomarkers. The great majority of omics datasets collected thus far resulted from a single omic (e.g. proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics and others) study, which represents a challenge for any subsequent multiomics integration analysis. Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) is a rapid and well-established technique for facilitating bottom-up proteomics preparation. However, FASP has only been employed in proteomics analysis and its utility for simultaneously isolating other biomolecules remains largely unexplored. This study assesses the performance of FASP as a convenient protocol to isolate protein and metabolite fraction from the same urine sample. Here FASP based LC-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 3163 non-redundant peptides, 957 of which were unique protein groups. In parallel, LC-Qtof-MS and GC-MS/MS analysis of metabolites fraction obtained from urine solvent based extraction, FASP filtrate, FASP residue (concentrated protein) detected 145 metabolites by LC-MS and 139 metabolites by GC-MS. Our study demonstrates that the outcomes from FASP filtrate are comparable to those from solid phase extraction or FASP residue, in terms of both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Arguing that the proposed multiomics- FASP protocol should be considered for a multiomics single-step sample preparation analysis.
Institute:Nova University of Lisbon
Department:Department of Chemistry
Laboratory:LAQV-REQUIMTE
Last Name:Mousa
First Name:Muath
Address:Largo da Torre, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Email:m.mousa@campus.fct.unl.pt
Phone:+351968720613

Subject:

Subject ID:SU003993
Subject Type:Human
Subject Species:Homo sapiens
Taxonomy ID:9606

Factors:

Subject type: Human; Subject species: Homo sapiens (Factor headings shown in green)

mb_sample_id local_sample_id Factor
SA424421Filtrate 01Metabolite peak Area
SA424422Filtrate 02Metabolite peak Area
SA424423Filtrate 03Metabolite peak Area
SA424424Conc 01Metabolite peak Area
SA424425Conc 02Metabolite peak Area
SA424426Conc 03Metabolite peak Area
SA424427Raw01Metabolite peak Area
SA424428Raw02Metabolite peak Area
SA424429Raw03Metabolite peak Area
Showing results 1 to 9 of 9

Collection:

Collection ID:CO003986
Collection Summary:Urine sample was collected from a member of disease biomarker group at the University of Sharjah. The participant gave informed consent for inclusion before enrollment in this study. The sample were centrifuged 5000 x g to remove the precipitated cells, the supernatant was transferred to new centrifuged tube and frozen at -80℃ until it is needed.
Sample Type:Urine
Collection Method:Midstream Clean-Catch Urine
Volumeoramount Collected:50 mL
Storage Conditions:-80℃

Treatment:

Treatment ID:TR004002
Treatment Summary:No treatment was applied to the urine samples, as this study aimed to assess metabolic variations within the same sample using two different processing methods during preparation

Sample Preparation:

Sampleprep ID:SP003999
Sampleprep Summary:Urine samples were divided into three analytical streams: (1) passed through a 10 kDa membrane (collecting both filtrate and residue), (2) untreated original urine. All samples were water-diluted before LC-MS analysis
Processing Storage Conditions:Room temperature

Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN006341
Chromatography ID CH004812
MS ID MS006042
Analysis type MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase
Chromatography system Bruker TIMS tof MS
Column Bruker Intensity Solo 1.8 C18-2 (2.1 × 100 mm 1.8 μm 90 Å)
MS Type ESI
MS instrument type QTOF
MS instrument name Bruker TIMS tof MS
Ion Mode POSITIVE
Units Area

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH004812
Instrument Name:Bruker TIMS tof MS
Column Name:Bruker Intensity Solo 1.8 C18-2 (2.1 × 100 mm 1.8 μm 90 Å)
Column Temperature:30℃
Flow Gradient:a 1% B solution was used for the first 2 minutes, after which it was gradually increased to 99% B between 2 and 17 minutes. The system was then held at 99% B for 3 minutes
Flow Rate:of 0.25 mL/min
Solvent A:100% Water; 0.1% Formic Acid
Solvent B:100% Acetonitrile; 0.1% Formic Acid
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase

MS:

MS ID:MS006042
Analysis ID:AN006341
Instrument Name:Bruker TIMS tof MS
Instrument Type:QTOF
MS Type:ESI
MS Comments:positive polarity as the most common metabolites were detected in positive polarity. The capillary voltage was 4500 V, 500V end plate offset, 10 L/min drying gas flow while the drying temperature was 220℃ and the nebulizer pressure was 2.2 bar. The time-of-flight scan range was 20–1300 m/z. Auto-MS/MS mode were operated with a collision energy of 20 eV, the cycle time to 0.5 s with a relative minimum intensity threshold of 400 counts per thousand and a target intensity of 20,000.
Ion Mode:POSITIVE
  logo