Summary of Study ST003600

This data is available at the NIH Common Fund's National Metabolomics Data Repository (NMDR) website, the Metabolomics Workbench, https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org, where it has been assigned Project ID PR002228. The data can be accessed directly via it's Project DOI: 10.21228/M8MZ51 This work is supported by NIH grant, U2C- DK119886.

See: https://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/about/howtocite.php

This study contains a large results data set and is not available in the mwTab file. It is only available for download via FTP as data file(s) here.

Perform statistical analysis  |  Show all samples  |  Show named metabolites  |  Download named metabolite data  
Download mwTab file (text)   |  Download mwTab file(JSON)   |  Download data files (Contains raw data)
Study IDST003600
Study TitleDevelopment of Food Material Source Technology for Future Alternative Meats (Including Cultured Meat)
Study SummaryThe growing demand for sustainable food sources has accelerated the development of cultured meat as an alternative to traditional meat products. This study aims to predict the safety and nutritional equivalence of cultured meat compared to conventional meat using a comprehensive metabolomics approach. In this study, we conducted a comparative metabolomic analysis of conventional chicken meat, muscle satellite cells, and differentiated cells. Our findings reveal that while the overall metabolic profiles of cultured and original meats are comparable, significant differences are observed in specific metabolites. Notably, metabolites associated with nutrient metabolism and synthesis display substantial variations among the samples. These differences suggest that the nutritional content of cultured meat may differ from that of traditional meat, potentially affecting its dietary value. Despite these differences in metabolic profiles, our analysis indicates that there is no significant impact on the safety of cultured meat itself. The safety of cultured meat remains within acceptable limits, and no adverse health risks were identified in the context of this study. However, the observed variations in nutrient-related metabolites highlight the need for further investigation to fully understand their implications. Our study contributes to the ongoing evaluation of cultured meat as a viable and safe alternative in the pursuit of sustainable food sources.
Institute
Sangmyung University
Last NameIhyeon
First NameCho
AddressJongno-gu, Seoul, 서울, 03057, South Korea
Emailmukuro259@gmail.com
Phone01021146997
Submit Date2024-11-19
Raw Data AvailableYes
Raw Data File Type(s)mzML
Analysis Type DetailLC-MS
Release Date2024-12-06
Release Version1
Cho Ihyeon Cho Ihyeon
https://dx.doi.org/10.21228/M8MZ51
ftp://www.metabolomicsworkbench.org/Studies/ application/zip

Select appropriate tab below to view additional metadata details:


Combined analysis:

Analysis ID AN005915 AN005916
Analysis type MS MS
Chromatography type Reversed phase Reversed phase
Chromatography system Thermo Vanquish Thermo Vanquish
Column Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD (50 × 2.1mm, 1.8um) Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD (50 × 2.1mm, 1.8um)
MS Type ESI ESI
MS instrument type Orbitrap Orbitrap
MS instrument name Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap Thermo Q Exactive Orbitrap
Ion Mode POSITIVE NEGATIVE
Units peak area peak area

Chromatography:

Chromatography ID:CH004492
Chromatography Summary:LC-MS/MS analysis for metabolomics was performed using a Q-Exactive Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) along with a Vanquish UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A 5 μL sample solution was injected into an Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD column (50 × 2.1 mm; id. 1.8 μm; Agilent, CA, USA) at 40°C. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.2 mL/min. Analytes were eluted from the column under a gradient (solvent A, 0.1% formic acid in water; solvent B, 0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile). The elution gradient was as follows: 2.5% B for 2 min, 2–12% B over 2–11 min, 12–28% B over 11–15 min; 28–60% B over 15–22 min; 96% B over 22–26 min; returned to 2.5% B for 5 min. Solvent A was run every sample as a blank solution.
Instrument Name:Thermo Vanquish
Column Name:Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD (50 × 2.1mm, 1.8um)
Column Temperature:40°C
Flow Gradient:2.5% B for 2 min, 2.0–12% B over 2–11 min, 12–28% B over 11–15 min; 28–60% B over 15–22 min; 96% B over 22–26 min; returned to 2.5% B for 5 min
Flow Rate:0.2 mL/min
Solvent A:100% water; 0.1% formic acid
Solvent B:80% acetonitrile/20% water; 0.1% formic acid
Chromatography Type:Reversed phase
  logo